Agentic Automated CTF 2025

Base Competition
Year
2025
Challenge Details

This competition uses the NYU CTF Lite, a streamlined benchmark of 50 challenges spanning six categories, adapted from the original NYU CTF Bench. To support easy integration with LLM-based agents, all challenges are provided in the standardized NYU CTF Bench format, fully compatible with the nyuctf pypi package for loading and interacting with autonomous agent frameworks.

While the true flags are included in accompanying metadata .json files, agents must independently solve each challenge and verify that the extracted flag matches the ground truth—no hardcoded answers allowed. A baseline agent system is provided in this repository, allowing competitors to build upon it with their own enhancements.

To request an API Key, please email nyuctf@gmail.com with all team members’ name, email and affiliation.

Rules
  • Team Participation: Teams of up to 3 people are allowed. Individual participation is also possible, but teamwork is highly recommended.
  • ​Agentic Framework: Participants are encouraged to analyze the general patterns of the challenges to optimize their agentic systems to make it specific for CTF automation; however, the final solutions must be generated entirely by an autonomous, LLM-powered agent, with no human-in-the-loop during execution. Participants are allowed and encouraged to use any techniques applicable to building effective agentic AI systems, including but not limited to prompt engineering, multi-agent, tool-augmented reasoning, and retrieval-augmented generation (RAG). These techniques may be applied broadly or tailored to specific challenge categories, but must remain generalizable—challenge-specific hints or hardcoded solutions are strictly prohibited. All the prompts used for challenge solutions must not include direct solutions from human players from any source; each solution that violates this rule will not be counted as solved. Participants must supply their own API tokens or model deployments for use within their autonomous frameworks. Any agentic framework may be used—including doing enhancements on open-source agentic frameworks, or custom-building systems from scratch. These frameworks must support full automation and may integrate real-time or pre-installed cybersecurity tools such as apk2jar, apktool, Ghidra, Hopper, Burp Suite, and Wireshark. All aspects of model selection, tool configuration, and system design are open-ended and left to the discretion of the participants.
  • Model Requirements: Participants are free to use any language model architecture for their agentic systems, including models accessed via API service providers (e.g., OpenAI, Anthropic), self-hosted open-source models (e.g., LLaMA, Qwen), or custom fine-tuned variants. There are no restrictions on model size, origin, or hosting setup. However, all models must be free of contamination, meaning they must not have been trained on or contain leaked solutions or flags from the competition dataset. Any evidence of flag leakage or training contamination will result in disqualification.
  • Evaluation: will be based entirely on the number of challenges successfully solved by the autonomous agent. Each correctly solved challenge contributes to the team’s final score, with no partial credit. The accuracy of the extracted flag, as verified against the ground truth, is the sole criterion for success.
  • Submissions: For each solved CTF challenge, participants must submit the full trajectory generated by their autonomous agent, including the agent’s thoughts, actions, observations, and the final flag, in a machine-loadable format (e.g., JSON or structured log). The extracted flag must exactly match the ground-truth flag provided in the metadata. Manual editing or tampering of the agent outputs is strictly prohibited and will result in disqualification. In addition, participants must provide a well-documented Git repository containing the complete codebase of their agentic framework. Open-source is encouraged, but a private repository shared with the organizer is also doable. This repository should include all dependencies, configurations, and tools used, along with detailed technical documentation outlining the participant’s approach—such as prompting techniques, model usage, agent architecture, tool integration, and any other implementation details. If a custom or fine-tuned model is used, training code and model weights should also be provided for validation.
  • API Keys and Data: All competitors may request API keys from OpenAI, Anthropic, and Gemini from the organizer, with an initial combined budget of up to $100 in credits every month during the competition. This budget may be extended as needed. Requesting API keys will automatically register participants for the competition. All competitors are required to open-source the code and data used in their submissions.
Judging Criteria

100 points in total, the final grade would be the weighted sum of all the judging criteria

  • Challenge Solved (50%): The number of CTF challenges solved by the participants, based on the score of each puzzle.​
  • Creativity (30%): The methods used for finding the vulnerabilities and solving the challenges. Adding innovative features to the framework, and trying unique approaches are all vectors for evaluation. Ultimately, be sure to include a summary about how the puzzle was solved by the LLM.  Using your own agent instead of the agent provided in the competition will give contestants a bonus under that judging criteria.
  • Presentation Quality (20% – 10% for writeups, 10% for final presentation): The quality of the final presentation. It should use the same approach that was suggested by the generative large language model you used. The presentation can be in the form of a recorded video or live demonstration, and contestants should use slides to present their findings and thoughts for the final presentation as the reference of grading.
  • Penalty items (deduction of 10% of the challenge score for each rule violation): The final solution must be provided by the automation framework with prompt engineering techniques, even if the participants come up with the proper solutions by themselves. Penalty items will be applied if the final solution does not come from the generative AI, even if participants find the correct solution independently. No points will be awarded for this challenge when participants use online writeups and source code to form or train the agent.
Registration Guidelines

This competition is open to the public and will run until all the 50 NYU CTF challenges are solved. 

No registration is required. The first submission with a valid and verifiable team information including team members’ name and contact email will be registered for the competition.

Submission Guidelines

For each solved CTF challenge, participants must submit the full trajectory generated by their autonomous agent, including the agent’s thoughts, actions, observations, and the final flag, in a machine-loadable format (e.g., JSON or structured log). The extracted flag must exactly match the ground-truth flag provided in the metadata. Manual editing or tampering of the agent outputs is strictly prohibited and will result in disqualification. In addition, participants must provide a well-documented Git repository containing the complete codebase of their agentic framework. Open-source is encouraged, but a private repository shared with the organizer is also doable. This repository should include all dependencies, configurations, and tools used, along with detailed technical documentation outlining the participant’s approach—such as prompting techniques, model usage, agent architecture, tool integration, and any other implementation details. If a custom or fine-tuned model is used, training code and model weights should also be provided for validation.

Timeline
Items
Start Date
EST
Finalists Cut off
EST
Finalists Announcement
EST
Note
Monthly leaderboard update is the 30th of every month.
Winners
1st
Rochester Institute of Technology
Kamdin Bembry
Christopher Newport University
Daniel Mayer
University of Central Florida
George Filippov
New York University
Zander Chen
New York University
Wentao He
2nd
New York University
Junjie Mai
Organizers & Judges
Ramesh Karri
Organizer
NYU Center for Cybersecurity
Co-chair
Ramesh Karri
Brendan Dolan-Gavitt
Organizer
NYU Osiris Lab
Faculty Advisor
Brendan Dolan-Gavitt
Venkata Sai Charan
Organizer
Venkata Sai Charan
Nanda Rani
Organizer
Nanda Rani
Kim Milner
Organizer
Kim Milner
Haoran Xi
Organizer
Haoran Xi
Minghao Shao
Organizer
NYU Tandon
Research Assistant
Minghao Shao
Abdul Basit
Organizer
Abdul Basit
Meet Udeshi
Organizer
Meet Udeshi